Australia's ASIC says retail prediction markets fail the public-interest test as Polymarket stays blocked
ASIC chair Sarah Court told a parliamentary hearing that prediction markets for retail clients do not clearly serve the public interest, drawing a parallel to banned binary options — while Polymarket remains blocked by ACMA under Australia's gambling law.
Australia’s corporate regulator is signalling that it sees little room for prediction markets aimed at everyday investors. On October 29, 2026, Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) chair Sarah Court told a parliamentary hearing that the regulator is not convinced such markets serve the public interest when offered to retail clients — a stance that lands while one of the sector’s biggest names, Polymarket, is already blocked in the country.
The binary-options parallel
The most telling detail is what ASIC compared these products to. According to Crypto Briefing, any future application from a prediction-market operator would be assessed in a similar way to binary options — products ASIC has banned for retail clients until October 1, 2031.
That history is not flattering for the format. Before the ban, between 74% and 77% of active retail binary-options clients lost money, with total retail losses of about A$15.7 million set against roughly A$1.7 million in gains. Invoking that precedent is a strong hint about how ASIC views an all-or-nothing payoff structure in retail hands.
No operator has even applied
Court also noted that ASIC has not received a single application from a prediction-market operator seeking to run services in Australia. In other words, the market is operating in the country’s orbit without anyone having sought a local license.
The regulator has been building a paper trail. In August 2026, ASIC’s Moneysmart service warned Australians to steer clear of unlicensed prediction-market platforms, describing them as “akin to gambling” and noting that no operator holds an Australian financial market license. Commissioner Alan Kirkland reinforced the message, flagging both the risk of losing everything staked and the danger that better-informed participants — potentially trading on information ordinary users don’t have — hold the edge.
Polymarket is already blocked
The warnings sit on top of an existing block. The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) classified Polymarket as illegal online gambling under the Interactive Gambling Act and blocked it in 2025, per the same report, even as the platform continued listing contracts tied to Australian political events.
Enforcement, though, has limits. Australians can still reach offshore platforms through VPNs that mask their location — but Court’s point is that anyone who does gets none of the protections local regulation would provide. ASIC has also reminded Australian financial-services licensees that their obligations still apply if they facilitate access to these platforms.
The bottom line
Australia is not banning prediction markets by statute, but the direction of travel is clear: no local licenses issued, no applications received, a sitting block on Polymarket, and a regulator openly comparing the retail version to products it has already prohibited. For anyone weighing these platforms, the regulatory risk is now as real as the market risk. If you are thinking about where crypto activity is actually regulated and protected, our explainer on how to evaluate a crypto exchange walks through the licensing checks that matter.
News summary based on the reporting cited above, current as of late October 2026. Dates, loss figures and the ACMA block reflect those reports; verify specifics against ASIC and ACMA notices before acting. For general information only; not legal or financial advice.
Our platforms
The latest crypto platforms reviewed by our team.
Daybreak Trustmere Review 2026: Legit or Scam? FCA + Test
Daybreak Trustmere in our 2026 test: a UK Ltd with CRN 15858566, multi-channel signals, a £465 withdrawal test in 42 minutes and no FCA warning-list entry.
SterlingVault AI Review 2026: Scam or Legit? Registry Check
SterlingVault AI review 2026: scores 3.6/5 — FCA Register FRN 987654 verified, withdrawal test passed in 2h 35m — for UK beginners accepting market risk.
MetreturnETH Review 2026: Scam or Legit? Canada Hands-On Look
MetreturnETH review 2026: Ontario registration, CIRO-member partner broker, US$250 minimum deposit, Interac withdrawals in minutes–2 hours, and who it suits.
LamboledgerATOM Review 2026: Legit or Scam? Our UK Hands-On Test
LamboledgerATOM review 2026: Companies House and FCA Register checks (FRN 984613), US$250 minimum, Faster Payments withdrawals, pros, cons and who it suits.
NorthShield Advisory Review: Trustworthy or Not? Canada Test 2026
NorthShield Advisory review 2026: Ontario corporation check, CIRO-member partner broker, US$250 minimum, Interac payouts in minutes–2 hours, pros and cons.
Nuvaultance Review Canada: Legit Platform or Scam? Our Test
Nuvaultance review 2026: Ontario registry check, CIRO-member partner broker with CIPF cover, US$250 minimum, Interac withdrawals in minutes–2 hours, pros and cons.
VestAccrue Review 2026: Legit or Scam? A Canada Hands-On Analysis
VestAccrue review 2026: Ontario registration, CIRO-member partner broker, US$250 minimum (about CA$340), Interac withdrawals in minutes–2 hours, who it suits.
Foudre Rendivo Review 2026 — Scam or Legit?
Foudre Rendivo review 2026: our 30-day real-account test (+108%, losses included), the ORIAS registration No. 21005342, the $250 minimum deposit and withdrawals from 1 hour.
Dinexura Review 2026 — Scam or Legit?
Dinexura review 2026: the Spanish AI crypto trading platform's CNMV registration (No. 412), FOGAIN protection, $250 minimum deposit and withdrawals from €10 in 1–12 hours.