Skip to content
BTC $98,420 +2.4% ETH $3,512 +1.8% BNB $712 -0.6% SOL $214 +4.1% XRP $2.38 -1.2% TON $5.44 +0.9% Fear & Greed: 72 · Greed
Regulation

South Korea weighs delaying its 22% crypto tax again as five exchanges meet officials

South Korea's ruling party is weighing another postponement of the 22% tax on crypto gains due to start on January 1, 2027, after a proposed amendment would tie the start date to global transaction-data sharing — and after officials consulted the country's five biggest exchanges.

South Korea is once again on the edge of postponing the tax it has promised to levy on crypto profits. The country’s ruling Democratic Party is weighing whether to delay the 22% tax on digital-asset gains scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2027 — a decision that, as of late October, it has repeatedly put off rather than settled.

What is actually being taxed

The levy is a combined 22% on qualifying crypto income above an annual basic deduction of 2.5 million won, according to crypto.news. That breaks down as a 20% national income tax plus local income tax. Income earned in 2027 would generally be reported in the first annual filing in May 2028, so the January 1 start sets the clock running rather than triggering an immediate bill.

It is not a new idea. Lawmakers first wrote crypto into the Income Tax Act through 2020 amendments, and have postponed the start three times since — making the current debate the fourth time the country has reached the brink and hesitated.

The amendment that ties tax to global reporting

The latest twist is a bill introduced on October 16, 2026 by Democratic Party lawmaker Park Min-gyu. Rather than simply pushing the date back, it would link the tax’s start to international transparency: the effective date would move to January 1 of the second year after South Korea first exchanges crypto transaction information under the OECD’s Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF). If that first data exchange happens in 2027, implementation would slip to January 1, 2029.

Park’s argument is a fairness one — taxing domestic users before overseas transaction data is reliably reported could leave people who trade on local platforms carrying a heavier, more visible burden than those using offshore venues. For readers new to why cross-border reporting matters here, our explainer on the crypto travel rule covers how transaction data moves between jurisdictions.

Where the ruling party stands

No final position had been locked in as of late October. Per Seoul Economic Daily, the party and government failed for a fourth time on October 28 to decide on a postponement, saying only that a stance would come “soon.” Reporting describes sentiment inside the party as clearly leaning toward a delay — initially around two years — with the presidential office said to favor postponement as well.

There is a practical signal too: at the party’s request, the government held off on the official tax notice it had planned to finalize by the end of October, and the National Tax Service was expected to issue guidance around November. A public petition seeking another delay reached 50,000 signatures in September.

Why the exchanges are at the table

Regulators did not make this call in isolation. Officials consulted the country’s five major exchanges — Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, DigitalX and Gopax — alongside executives from the Digital Asset Exchange Alliance (DAXA) on October 20, 2026. Exchanges sit at the center of any workable regime because they are the parties expected to track cost basis, report gains and, eventually, feed data into the international exchange the amendment hinges on.

The bottom line

South Korea has a 22% crypto tax on the books for January 1, 2027, a ruling party that appears to favor delaying it, and a bill that would reframe the start date around global data-sharing rather than a fixed calendar date — but no final decision yet. If you trade on Korean platforms, the safest move is to watch for the National Tax Service’s formal notice rather than headlines. And if you are reassessing where and how you trade more broadly, our guide to the best crypto exchanges and our explainer on how to evaluate a crypto exchange are good starting points.

News summary based on the reporting cited above, current as of late October 2026. Tax figures, dates and the amendment’s terms reflect those reports; verify specifics against the National Tax Service and official notices before acting. For general information only; not tax, legal or financial advice.

Our platforms

The latest crypto platforms reviewed by our team.

Daybreak Trustmere

Daybreak Trustmere Review 2026: Legit or Scam? FCA + Test

Daybreak Trustmere in our 2026 test: a UK Ltd with CRN 15858566, multi-channel signals, a £465 withdrawal test in 42 minutes and no FCA warning-list entry.

3.7/5Read review →
SterlingVault AI

SterlingVault AI Review 2026: Scam or Legit? Registry Check

SterlingVault AI review 2026: scores 3.6/5 — FCA Register FRN 987654 verified, withdrawal test passed in 2h 35m — for UK beginners accepting market risk.

3.6/5Read review →
MetreturnETH

MetreturnETH Review 2026: Scam or Legit? Canada Hands-On Look

MetreturnETH review 2026: Ontario registration, CIRO-member partner broker, US$250 minimum deposit, Interac withdrawals in minutes–2 hours, and who it suits.

4/5Read review →
LamboledgerATOM

LamboledgerATOM Review 2026: Legit or Scam? Our UK Hands-On Test

LamboledgerATOM review 2026: Companies House and FCA Register checks (FRN 984613), US$250 minimum, Faster Payments withdrawals, pros, cons and who it suits.

3.9/5Read review →
NorthShield Advisory

NorthShield Advisory Review: Trustworthy or Not? Canada Test 2026

NorthShield Advisory review 2026: Ontario corporation check, CIRO-member partner broker, US$250 minimum, Interac payouts in minutes–2 hours, pros and cons.

3.8/5Read review →
Nuvaultance

Nuvaultance Review Canada: Legit Platform or Scam? Our Test

Nuvaultance review 2026: Ontario registry check, CIRO-member partner broker with CIPF cover, US$250 minimum, Interac withdrawals in minutes–2 hours, pros and cons.

3.9/5Read review →
VestAccrue

VestAccrue Review 2026: Legit or Scam? A Canada Hands-On Analysis

VestAccrue review 2026: Ontario registration, CIRO-member partner broker, US$250 minimum (about CA$340), Interac withdrawals in minutes–2 hours, who it suits.

3.8/5Read review →
Foudre Rendivo

Foudre Rendivo Review 2026 — Scam or Legit?

Foudre Rendivo review 2026: our 30-day real-account test (+108%, losses included), the ORIAS registration No. 21005342, the $250 minimum deposit and withdrawals from 1 hour.

3.9/5Read review →
Dinexura

Dinexura Review 2026 — Scam or Legit?

Dinexura review 2026: the Spanish AI crypto trading platform's CNMV registration (No. 412), FOGAIN protection, $250 minimum deposit and withdrawals from €10 in 1–12 hours.

3.9/5Read review →